The Barefoot Muse
A Journal Of Formal & Metrical Verse
Congratulations to former contributors Catherine Chandler and Michael Battram for almost making it into the Best of the Net 2006. Follow the links below to read their fine poems in our archives:
It is an honor to be a finalist in this exciting new annual contest, and visits to the journal have definitely surged as a result. Next year, we'll try for a winner!
Here's some very exciting news for all you e-zine editors out there. A discussion group has been started to plan an organization dedicated solely to your needs. Neither the organization name nor the mission statement are finalized yet, and we are a long way from implementation. However the mission statement under discussion is presently this:
To raise awareness and improve the public image of online literary publishing. Toward this end, we will work to provide resources to internet publishers, writers, and readers. We will further provide and advocate for awards and other venues recognizing excellence in online literary publishing and writing.
Any editor or interested party can join the discussion group, so if you want to be involved in this important venture from the beginning, simply click on the link below:
Click to join literaryonline
Congratulations to Ms. Lockward on her fine achievement. I do hope to hear from other contributors, both past and present, when their work gains awards or recognition, so that I can publicize it on these pages.
And now what you've all been waiting for: my 2006 Pushcart Prize nominations.
From the current issue:
From the Summer 2006 issue: (No surprises here)
I would like to present The Barefoot Muse's nominations for the Best of the Net Anthology to be brought out by Sundress publications.
From the Summer 2006 issue:
From the Winter 2005 issue:
Good luck everyone! It would be gratifying to see some formal/metrical work in the anthology.
A stirring defense of rhyming and/or metrical poetry is mounted in the July/August Issue of Poets & Writers Magazine by Reagan Upshaw, an NYC poet and art dealer. In answer to the question of how we can lodge our poems in a reader's memory he replies "Poems with rhyme and meter have a better chance of survival."
Also today, I discovered a new online poetry journal dedicated to formal poetry by women. Visit Mezzo Cammin for some fine poems by contemporary formal greats Rhina P. Espaillat and Jennifer Reeser, as well as criticism centered on women who write formal verse.
Recently I have been coming across more and more instances of journal guidelines which state "No rhyming poetry" or "No end rhyme." At first I wasn't sure if I should be disturbed by this or not. After all, here at The Barefoot Muse we only publish formal and/or metrical poetry. Don't other journals therefore, have the right to exclude rhyme?
Then I decided there was a subtle difference. We are a niche journal: we INCLUDE work belonging to the positive space defined by the boundaries of our niche. That's okay, in the same way as it is okay for a journal to accept only science-fiction poems or haiku. The difference in the "No Rhyme" case is that this is typically a mainstream journal defining a negative space--not our entire niche but a significant portion of it--and EXCLUDING that.
The problem with EXCLUSION as opposed to INCLUSION, as I think any minority group will tell you, is one of implied hierarchy. I don't believe there is a hidden message on this site regarding free verse: it simply doesn't belong in this niche. Personally, I read, write and credit a great deal of free verse. However, the hidden message in the "No Rhyme" journals is that rhyming poems are "no-good" or "old-fashioned."
Clearly I don't agree with that message. Nor do the top echelon journals--Poetry, for example, quite regularly publishes poetry in traditional forms.
Therefore I am compiling a Give Rhyme a Break List of all journals who have such wording in their guidelines. Please email me every time you come across a new example of such a journal. Note: other niche journals which exclude rhyme automatically because of the nature of THEIR niche, e.g. concrete poetry journals, do not count. Similarly any journal that has "Free Verse" or "Verse Libre" in the title may be excused. The oft-seen phrase "No Hallmark verse" doesn't bother me either. (I quite regularly reject whole batches of Hallmark verse and good riddance.) What we're trying to do here is to get those journals that believe they can represent the breadth of excellence in poetry today without including any rhyme, to analyse their own thought processes and justify its exclusion. I would love to hear from the editors themselves. In many cases, I think they may just not be aware of the kind of lyrical brilliance we new formalists can produce!
Let's get the discussion going.