Dreaming in Iambic Pentameter

May 16, 2008

Barefoot Muse Update

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 7:08 pm

Today I enjoyed my favorite part of running an online literary journal–the part where I sit down surrounded by copies of all the poems I have either accepted or am holding for second review, and I piece together the actual content of the next issue. I’m often asked what I look for when I’m doing this. In other words, why do poems get rejected at second review stage?

First and foremost, poets should understand that if I am holding their poem for second review it is good enough to be in the journal. I received over 900 poems for this issue, of which I accepted 8 outright and held a further 29 for second review. (I accept poems outright if I simply love them, and feel they would fit in any issue of the journal.) Two of those held were withdrawn, which is, of course, a risk of this strategy.

The main reason poems get rejected at second review is (and I know I’m repeating myself) that I get too many sonnets. Of those remaining 27 poems for review, 12 were sonnets. Of the 9 poems I rejected, 6 were sonnets. I love sonnets! But I don’t want TBM turning into a sonnet journal. There’s 14 By 14 for that. The next issue of TBM has several nonce and blank verse pieces, a rondeau, a sestina, a triolet, a pantoum, a villanelle, a ghazal, and several of the popular light verse forms.

Also, if I’ve held two poems from one poet, I rarely publish both of them, unless they are short light verse pieces. (There are exceptions to this, naturally.) 2 of the 9 rejected poems would have been the second poem by an accepted author.

The final rejected poem was simply a case where I had two very similar pieces on very similar subjects. Then it does come down to my own subjective opinion on which is better (which is not to say that the other one wasn’t good.) Nepotists take note: I ended up rejecting the poem by the contributor I know personally. Them’s the breaks.

I do not, as I have been accused of in the past, take any account of gender in making these decisions. I actually count up my probable gender ratio AFTER I have made my decisions and sent off my emails, once I have placed the poems onto the main contents page of the journal. In the upcoming issue, however, I’m pleased to say I’ve got a better balance than before. Out of the 26 poets, 14 are male and 11 female.

But the most vitally important thing is to feel that I have created the best issue I could from the poems I received, so that readers can either dip in and read poems individually on the basis of title or author, or sit down and read the whole thing from virtual cover to cover.

That’s what an Editor does.

May 8, 2008

Quick Update

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 4:01 pm

You can find several very different poems of mine newly online this week. Over at Lucid Rhythms there’s a lewd sonnet called “Clandestinia” alongside a piece of light verse, “Bachelorette Desdemona Discusses Her Final Choice.” Then, my friends at Literary Mama have published the free verse piece “To My Daughter After a Fight.”
I’m being interviewed for the June issue of Wordgathering, which should be interesting. Oh, and I am now officially the Associate Editor of the Raintown Review. So, in addition to making the final decisions on the second review poems for The Barefoot Muse, I also have a bunch of submissions to filter for that journal.
Busy, busy, busy.

April 15, 2008

Poetry News!

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 12:33 pm

You can read a previously unpublished sonnet of mine, The Turn up at 14 By 14, along with a short prose piece regarding my sonnet preferences. It should go without saying that the rest of the issue is also excellent, with pieces by previous Barefoot Muse contributors Carol Taylor, Maryann Corbett, Chris O’Carroll, Catherine Chandler, David Landrum, R. Nemo Hill and Kathryn Jacobs.

Oh, and I discovered that Salamander actually pay for published poems! $30! It’s good to feel valued, even if it won’t do more than cover my next splurge at Amazon!

April 12, 2008

Good Reason Not to Despise Genre Fiction

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 6:16 pm

I’ve always loved science fiction, and one sub-division of that genre has consistently appealed to me. It doesn’t have a name so I’ll christen it the Transit type, after the first novel of the kind that I read when still a child, by one Edmund Cooper. Better known examples of Transit sci-fi would be the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, by Stephen Donaldson, and Restoree by Anne McCaffery. Basically, in Transit sci-fi, the hero (or heroine) is whisked away, often by undisclosed means, to a different planet/ an alternative universe/ another time.

One of the last writers included in the NAofAAL is Octavia Butler, who writes speculative fiction. The anthology includes a short story by her–I think it was called “Bloodchild”–which impressed me hugely, so when I returned the Norton to the library yesterday, i decided to check out one of her novels, Kindred. Wow!

In Kindred a late twentieth century black woman called Dana is whisked away by undisclosed means to ante-bellum Maryland, where her purpose appears to be to protect her white ancestor, accident prone plantation owner’s son, Rufus Weylin, until he manages to begin her family line. This is not only a rocking good story, but the issues and history raised are provocative and fresh. Dana’s white husband Kevin gets trapped for five years in the time period, for example, which causes him all sorts of issues. I was glad of the background from the anthology, as I wouldn’t have got all the references before reading it, but you wouldn’t need to know any of that to enjoy the book.

This is the kind of book that people should be ashamed to pigeon-hole as genre fiction. The good news is, she’s written at least nine other books! Happy day!

April 10, 2008

Project Update

Filed under: Poetry, If Only I Could Vote — Anna M Evans @ 12:58 pm

I just finished the Norton Anthology of African American Literature. It’s been a journey (4 weeks!) and I feel both saddened and enriched. I am saddened because there are still no easy answers to the impossible question of what white people should do, and how should we behave, in the presence of the enormity of our past. I still believe that reading across a broad cultural basis can only help, all the time dreading, nevertheless, that people of both ethnicities view me as unnatural, smug and self-righteous for following this path. (Stand up: the two white women who, upon seeing the NAofAAL on my kitchen table asked me WHY I was reading it.)

I have always personally sought understanding through literature in a way that may not necessarily work for everyone. There are other ways to engage, but engage we (white people) must. Nothing has been solved. Loudly proclaiming you “don’t see color” is only an option if you are white, and anyway, it probably isn’t true–you would just like it to be. It’s easier than dealing with the swirling tides of contradictory feelings that actually arise when, for example, a young black man dressed in the youth fashion–long white tee shirt, baggy jeans at the hips, baseball cap–approaches you on a dark street in Philadelphia late at night.

Enough of this. Onward and upward. Next stop: Southern Road by Sterling Brown.

Also some good news: Salamander have taken my poem “Worker” for a future issue.

April 2, 2008

An Understandable Dearth: Unpublishable and White

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 7:14 am

Since Major Jackson published his landmark essay “A Mystifying Silence: Big and Black,” like many other white poets I have been considering the question, posed therein, of why so few white poets are visibly tackling the subject of race. Jackson himself wonders “how much self-censorship or ambivalence is at work among white poets” and goes on to suggest that “contemporary fiction writers…are more willing to take risks.” In other words, white poets perhaps prefer not to engage with this subject because, ever since the advent of confessional poetry, readers typically assume that the first person speaker of a poem is the poet, an assumption that is far less readily made in fiction. Hence, because the topic of race is so ultra-sensitive, white poets justifiably fear any words they write on the subject may be held against them. No doubt there is some truth in this view.

But what if this isn’t entirely the case? What if a large part of the answer is actually far simpler and can readily be expressed in the terms of the market forces so beloved of our capitalist society? (Yes, we know there’s no money in poetry, but Po-Biz has already amply demonstrated that money is superfluous to the control of its supply/demand curve.) Maybe white poets don’t write about race because it is incredibly difficult for a white poet to get a poem about race published (unless he or she happens to be called Tony Hoagland.)

Unpacking this, let’s begin with the postulation that most literary journals are liberal. There are of course exceptions to this rule, including, alas, several New Formalist journals. Digressing for the sake of example, I have the last copy of the now defunct Iambs & Trochees in my possession. Examining names and bios I’d hazard a guess that none of the fifty contributors is African American. The issue also includes a poem about race that illustrates Mr. Jackson’s point elegantly. If you were a liberal white editor, would you wish to have your name associated with the following lines from the sonnet “Affirmative Action in Action” by Malcolm Paige?

We’re afraid we’ll have to go
With young Ms. Ti-Abeba Grant…
Of course, Ms. Grant will be on track
For quick promotion in no time…

Sho’ ‘nuff, massa—I’ll get back
Behind the modern color-line.

Distasteful or not, this poem does engage with race and some of the very real fears that affirmative action generates among white people, a topic also bravely addressed by Barack Obama in his recent speech.

I doubt it would have found a home in any of the large number of literary journals associated with the creative writing departments of universities, of which I think it’s safe to say the majority are liberal. Most of these would not dream of permitting a poem expressing a first person politically incorrect sentiment to appear between their pages. (Would Frank Bidart’s “Herbert White” get published today, I wonder?)

In vain I trawled my not insubstantial collection of literary journals—contributors copies, samples and back numbers of Agni, Rattle, 32 Poems, Field, the Literary Review—looking for ANY poem on the subject of black/white race relations by ANY poet, black or white, and found nothing. Poems about Vietnam? Check. Poems about being Jewish, and the Holocaust? Check. (So it’s not as though we Caucasians aren’t engaging with our shameful history.)

But hang on a moment. Where were the poems about race by African Americans? Indeed, where were the poems by African Americans? I know some do make it into issues of these journals that I don’t possess, because I have seen them. And I am fairly certain that this isn’t a question of editorial prejudice—submissions by African American poets being excluded on the basis of race—because I am equally certain that these particular journals would fall over themselves to publish a good poem by an African American, underlining their liberal commitment to diversity. But my brief survey suggests that these are few and far between. So where are these poems about race, and/or by African Americans, appearing?

With apologies to my good friend Major Jackson (who understands that I do all this out of a commitment to understanding and truth) here are some highlights from the acknowledgements page of his first excellent book Leaving Saturn: Xavier Review, Obsidian II, Callaloo, Painted Bride Quarterly, Crab Orchard Review, American Poetry Review, New Yorker.

O white reader, of those first three journals, you have probably only heard of Callaloo, which is the foremost literary journal of the African Diaspora. Xavier Review and Obsidian II are two other journals whose primary focus is the literature of the Diaspora. That leaves just a couple of opportunities (PBQ, Crab Orchard) for a young white poet to appear alongside Mr. Jackson’s early work before he made it into the big time—most of us only dream of being in the New Yorker or APR.

Five of the poems from Tracy K. Smith’s award winning first collection Duende also appeared first in Callaloo. In other words, if I can draw a conclusion from this admittedly small sample, it would be that fledgling African American poets tend to publish many of their poems about race in journals which are self-segregating. How can white poets have a poetic dialogue about race with African American poets, when the latter’s poems are appearing in journals white poets can’t get into and, (some would say, therefore,) don’t read? More importantly, how can we expect the white editor of a liberal literary journal to publish a poem on race by a white poet if he doesn’t have a balancing poem on race by an African American poet to put alongside it? Wouldn’t even Malcolm Paige’s poem look more forgivable if it was located next to a feisty piece by Erica Dawson, winner of the 2006 Hecht Prize, about being a young, black, female formalist?

Don’t get me wrong—I’m all for journals with specific constituencies. Callaloo has every much right to exist as Literary Mama, Measure and Pan-American Haiku. But the existence of Callaloo as a preferred market for poetry of the Diaspora by African Americans perversely makes it harder for white poets to get their poetry about race published anywhere (except, perhaps, right wing journals like Iambs & Trochees. But most of our race poems are more tolerant than Malcolm Paige’s; many are sympathetic, despairing, even.)

What about Tony Hoagland, I hear you say? His controversial poems “The Change,” about the Williams sisters, and “Rap Music,” were published by Agni and Lyric respectively. This is according to the acknowledgements page of What Narcissism Means to Me, from which I also learn that no fewer than thirteen of the book’s poems were published by American Poetry Review. Hoagland is an ‘A’ list poet, and has been for a while. He’s up there with Billy Collins, Sharon Olds, Louise Gluck et al. On Jeffrey Bahr’s Print Journal Ranking Difficulty Scale, APR rates an 8, putting it in the top five most exclusive literary journals, where AGNI gets a 5 (the same rating, incidently, as Callaloo) and Lyric a mere 3. It makes good marketing sense for those second tier journals to publish Hoagland, regardless of the subject matter of his poems. (But why didn’t those poems end up in APR?)

Over-simplifying, admittedly, one observable difference between black and white poets could be that the former begin by publishing poems about race in second tier segregated journals, and move on to publishing slightly less charged material in the top end mainstream literary journals, whereas white poets can only get poems about race published in the second tier mainstream literary journals once they have established their credentials at the top end—a progression in a different direction.
What’s to be done? Well, young African-American poets need to submit poems about race to second tier non-segregated mainstream literary journals. In return, those journals need to have a braver policy about accepting poems on a racial theme, regardless of the ethnic origin of the author. One of the journals could even do a special issue with race as a theme, encouraging submissions from poets of all colors.

And Callaloo? Why couldn’t they call for some poetry on the theme of the African Diaspora written by white poets? I have some languishing in a drawer that I would be delighted to send them.

March 30, 2008

Spring “Break”? Don’t Make Me Laugh…

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 10:17 am

It’s been a long and difficult week, for many and varied reasons with which I have no need to bore you. However, as a reply to everyone who helped to make the week what it was, here’s a sonnet by Claude McKay. You may recognize it as the poem quoted by Winston Churchill in a rallying speech against Nazis in World War II. You may not know that Claude McKay was an African American poet, prominent in the Harlem Renaissance.

If We Must Die

If we must die, let it not be like hogs
Hunted and penned in an inglorious spot,
While round us bark the mad and hungry dogs,
Making their mock at our accursed lot.
If we must die, O let us nobly die,
So that our precious blood may not be shed
In vain; then even the monsters we defy
Shall be constrained to honor us though dead!
O kinsmen! we must meet the common foe!
Though far outnumbered let us show us brave,
And for their thousand blows deal one deathblow!
What though before us lies the open grave?
Like men we’ll face the murderous, cowardly pack,
Pressed to the wall, dying, but fighting back!

March 23, 2008

Things to Celebrate!

Filed under: Family Stuff, Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 10:10 am
  1. I’m joint featured poet of the month at Anti with my poem “Scare Quotes Reformation Scare Quotes,” which is quite possibly the weirdest poem I’ve ever had published. In keeping with its mood, the author photo is of my torso attached to a 24 hour Holter monitor. Enjoy!
  2. My puppy slept through the night last night, out of his crate, and although my husband got up to let him out at 6 a.m. we then went BACK to bed, and when we got up at 9 he had NOT had an accident!
  3. 14×14, the sonnet e-zine I panel for, have solicited one of my sonnets for the forthcoming issue. They’re publishing “The Turn,” a poem I’m very attached to for various reasons.
  4. Although the formal poetry board Eratosphere (where I am a long time lurker and occasional poster) was brought down a few weeks ago by malicious hackers, it has been resurrected temporarily as Eratosphere in Exile, so if that’s somewhere you too used to hang out, you can simply go and register at the new board until the original site is restored.
  5. It’s Easter Sunday! I have a ham ready to go in the oven, and then there’s cheesecake. Plus there’s chocolate everywhere! Happy Egg Hunting!

March 18, 2008

“Your Dreams Don’t Have to Come at the Expense of My Dreams”–Barack Obama

Filed under: Poetry, If Only I Could Vote — Anna M Evans @ 1:55 pm

Today one of the most forward thinking Americans ever to run for President delivered a rousing speech admitting that racism, anger and resentment exist in both black and white communities, and encouraging Americans to unite in order to transcend the tragedy of the past and tackle the more important issues relevant to all.

This seems like a good moment to review my progress on the Norton Anthology of African American Literature, a volume which is indeed weighty enough to hold open a symbolically solid door.

The first section of the book, interestingly, covers the vernacular tradition, which includes Spirituals, Gospel, The Blues, Jazz, R&B and Hip Hop, before moving on to some important prose speeches, including the one to which Obama’s speech will no doubt be compared: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream.”

Also unmissable in this section: Billie Holiday singing “Strange Fruit”, and for sheer 80s nostalgia: Grand Master Flash’s video of “The Message.”

Thus the anthology offers a fairly easy route in (for the white writer) before slamming down a heavy load of hard truths in the second section: The Literature of Slavery & Freedom, 1746-1865. Maybe it’s because I’m not American, but there are some facts I could not have told you that should not be glossed over. Did you, O white reader, know, for example, that 1 in 8 Africans died at sea during the dreaded “Middle Passage?” Or that in 1787 at the Philadelphia Convention, a slave was decreed to be three fifths a man? Or that, following the Turner Rebellion it was forbidden to teach slaves to read & write?

Given these facts, it is all the more incredible that Phillis Wheatley was able to publish in 1773 the first ever book of poems by an African American. I refer you to this excellent essay by June Jordan for more information on Ms. Wheatley.

From the very beginning, civil rights and women’s rights were inextricably intertwined. Former slave Sojourner Truth dealt male chauvinism a major blow at a Women’s Rights Convention in 1851, when she countered the argument that women were weak and needed to be protected by pointing out that she had done a slave’s work alongside male slaves all her life and wasn’t she a woman?

Also in this section is a peculiarly American genre of literature known as the “slave narrative,” an important tool in the hands of abolitionists at home and abroad, indispensable for ridiculing claims that the African intellect was in any way inferior. Everyone should read at least one of these highly literate accounts of horrifying lives in slavery (and eventually, freedom won): Venture Smith, Olaudah Equiano, Harriet Jacobs, William Wells Brown, Elizabeth Keckley, and of course, Frederick Douglass.

It all provides a perspective on just how deep the racial wounds of this country go, wounds that America normally keeps covered with a bandage of shame. Today, Obama bravely peeled away the bandage and showed us the ulcer, not to evoke the unreasoning emotions of sympathy and guilt, but in the hope that the fresh air might finally help it heal.

“Let us find that common stake we all have in one another,” he said, “and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.”

March 13, 2008

More Good Poetry News

Filed under: Poetry — Anna M Evans @ 10:15 am

I’m pleased and proud to announce that Leah Browning, Editor of Apple Valley Review, has chosen to nominate my poem “Collapse” to appear in the Best New Poets 2008 Anthology. Thanks Leah!

Also, the Spring 2008 issue of Wordgathering is up, with my thesis poem “After the Surgery.” Wordgathering is a fine journal of disability-oriented poetry; Editor Mike Northern shares the vision of the Split This Rock Poetry Festival that “poetry can act as an agent for change: reaching across differences, considering personal and social responsibility, asserting the centrality of the right to free speech, bearing witness to the diversity and complexity of human experience through language, imagining a better world.”

And if that isn’t all worth celebrating, what is?

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress